Safety of essential oils: why do we not recommend their internal use?

Back 28. 08. 2025

What are the risks associated with internal use of essential oils?

Today, essential oils enjoy enormous popularity, and their use has expanded from traditional aromatherapy into the area of internal ingestion. Despite the fact that on the internet and social media we often encounter recommendations for the internal use of essential oils, the professional community takes a reserved stance toward this approach. In this article, we explain why internal use of essential oils in home aromatherapy is discouraged and present scientifically based arguments in this field.

Concentration and potency

One of the key arguments against internal use of essential oils is their extreme concentration. Essential oil in a bottle is 50–100 times more concentrated than in the original plant. This fact has fundamental implications for safe use.

For illustration: one drop of peppermint essential oil corresponds to approximately 26–28 cups of peppermint tea. Such a concentration can cause irritation of the mucous membranes of the digestive tract, and with long-term use may lead to damage to the liver or kidneys.

To produce 1 litre of peppermint essential oil, approximately 200–250 kg of fresh leaves are needed. In the case of lemon balm (Melissa officinalis), even 3–5 tonnes of plant material are required. This explains the high price of lemon balm oil as well as the extreme concentration of active substances.

The bioavailability of essential oils with internal ingestion is up to 95 %, with inhalation approximately 50 %, and with application on the skin only about 5 %. This means that when ingested, almost the entire dose enters the bloodstream – which is a heavy load for the liver and a toxicity risk.

Risk of toxicity

Many essential oils contain substances that are potentially toxic when used internally. The most high-risk include:

 

Oregano (Origanum vulgare):

 

Thyme (Thymus vulgaris):

 

Cinnamon bark (Cinnamomum verum):

 

Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus):

 

Wintergreen (Gaultheria procumbens):

 

Tea Tree (Melaleuca alternifolia):

Insufficient regulation and standardization

Unlike pharmaceutical preparations, essential oils intended for internal use are not subject to strict regulation. There are no established standardized dosages, which leads to situations where consumers do not have sufficient information about safe amounts.

In the food industry, some components of essential oils are used as flavourings (GRAS – Generally Recognized As Safe), but these are highly purified substances and used in micro quantities. This is fundamentally different from the use of common EO sold for cosmetics or aromatherapy. Labelling cosmetic EO as “suitable for consumption” may be in conflict with legislation.

 

Safe use of essential oils in natural cosmetics or in aromatherapy.

Specific risks of internal use

Damage to the digestive system

Hepatotoxicity

Drug interactions

Neurological effects

Safe ways to use EO

Inhalation

Topical application

Aromatic baths

Conclusion

Internal use of essential oils represents a disproportionately high risk compared with the potential benefits. The extreme concentration of active substances, insufficient regulation, and the possibility of serious side effects make this practice dangerous for the general public.

Internal use of essential oils should take place exclusively under the supervision of qualified healthcare professionals with appropriate knowledge of aromatherapy and essential oil interactions. In the European Union, essential oils are classified as food supplements only when they meet strict quality and safety criteria. Most essential oils available on the market, however, are not intended for internal use, and their sale for this purpose may be in conflict with legislation.

 

Even though many essential oils in our range are classified as food supplements, we do not recommend their internal use and we sell them exclusively for aromatherapy and cosmetic manufacturing purposes.